Select Page

Looking back from 2050…?

A short history of Coup d’états

A coup d’état is the removal of an existing government, or a takeover using unlawful means. Typically, it is an illegal, unconstitutional seizure of power by a political faction, the military, or a dictator.


Failed: The Munich Putsch (or ‘Beer Hall Putsch’), was a failed coup d’état by Nazi Party leader Adolf Hitler, Erich Ludendorff and other leaders in Munich, Bavaria, on 8–9 November 1923, during the Weimar Republic. Approximately two thousand Nazis marched on the city centre, but were confronted by a police cordon, which resulted in the deaths of 16 Nazi Party members and four police officers. The leaders were put in jail but 7 years later Adolf Hitler later gained a minority power in government from where he was able to gain absolute power and institute the dictatorship of the ‘Third Reich’.

— Bolshevik Revolution November 6-7, 1917 (October 24-25 on the Julian calendar, which is why the event is often referred to as the October Revolution), leftist revolutionaries led by Bolshevik Party leader Vladimir Lenin launched a nearly bloodless coup d’état against the Duma’s provisional government. In the name of the people (the ‘proletariat’), Lenin moved quickly to establish the organs of a totalitarian dictatorship which ruled Russia until 1991.

Success: 2020 USA. Marxists gained control of the US Democratic Party. After setting in place new postal balloting legislation and with the support of business and Social Media giants against a background of restrictions due to a nation-wide pandemic, instituted a programme of intensive ballot rigging at targeted locations during the November election. The coup d’état was finally sealed by the President’s call for a demonstration on the day Congress were to debate election fraud. Activists inserted into the crowd orchestrated an attack on the Congress itself and the media presented it as being led by the President.








Dave Scott-Morgan.   January 2021.








The new Biden administration does not know if it is legal. It does not know if it has the support of the people.
That’s why they need the massive military presence waiting in the wings.
They know that they participated in widespread vote rigging in the election and if, or rather when, an investigation is carried out, the election tally will not be as is now assumed. With the help of a pliant media, the popular story is that Biden won the election handsomely, and if that were true, he would be the legal head of state. But at best, the top Democrats know that the election result is faulty and skewed by their own actions. The real results are unknown to them, or to us, but they fear in reality, it was a landslide for Trump.
Still they are moving apace with moves that are set to be highly unpopular. The sort of moves that you need to have a military presence standing by for! The media continues for the time being to cooperate with a narrative of good Biden, bad Trump, but when the will of the people starts to seep out, even the media will begin looking the other way.
The administration cries of ‘enemies within’ and ‘sabotage’ will work for awhile but will not wash when the dollar goes downhill and the great American powerhouse falls from pre-eminence.
Dave 29 Jan 2021


Whatever side of the argument you are on (whether for Trump or for Biden), you have to agree that corruption in the election process is bad news for everybody and it is in everyone’s interest to find out about any shenanigans that have occurred. There should be no political bias forbidding investigation…
.. There should be no political bias forbidding investigation and no reason to suppress evidence.

Instead of helping to report stories of election irregularities which have massive national ramifications, the regular media is trying to suppress them or else side-lining them; – for example election anomalies have been described as “baseless”. They did the same with the story about Hunter Biden’s laptop because it was not a helpful headline to them.


The main media and tech giants are:
How can we get a rounded picture of the facts when big tech and social media are only allowing one-sided biased information? One way is to check out the outlets that are giving another perspective and do not automatically support the Biden side of the issue as does big media.


NTD News Today   (Alternative news platform)
R&R Law Group     (for Granular details of law suits etc)
Wide Angle            (in depth reports)
Matt Braynard      (Election integrity reports & info) 
Russ Ramsland      (voter fraud expert)
Eric Metaxas          (talk show host)
Lance Wallnau      (Christian futurist)
Michael Matt, Remnant TV 
Patrick Byrne & his team, articles and stats. 
One America News
News Maxx
The Epoch Times

These report stories that big media ignores. To find them you can search on YouTube using the key words above.
Dave Scott-Morgan    Jan 2021